Q1: One of Culler’s most important points about theory is
that “works regarded as theory have effects
beyond their original field” (3). What do you think this means? Related to
this, how could literary texts also
become theories? For example, could The
Hobbit be a theory? Jane Eyre?
Q2: How can writing about a thing create a thing? The book
uses the example of sex and sexual relations; how can writing about marriage
(for example) actually create the social codes of marriage?
Q3: Why do many theorists suggest that writing is more than a supplement (or
duplication) of speech? Is it possible for something to be truly original, and not
a copy of a copy of a copy?
Q4: Quoting the famous (and famously difficult) French
theorist, Jacques Derrida, Culler writes, “There is no outside-of-text’: when
you think you are getting outside signs and text, to ‘reality itself,’ what you
find is more text, more signs, chains of supplements” (12). What do you think
he means by this? Can you give an example of this in the ‘real’ world?
No comments:
Post a Comment